Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Europa League 2025/26
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | +13 | 18:5 | 21 | |
| 2 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | +8 | 14:6 | 21 | |
| 3 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | +10 | 18:8 | 19 | |
| 4 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +6 | 13:7 | 17 | |
| 5 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +6 | 13:7 | 17 | |
| 6 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +6 | 11:5 | 17 | |
| 7 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +6 | 10:4 | 17 | |
| 8 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | +7 | 13:6 | 16 | |
| 9 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | +4 | 11:7 | 16 | |
| 10 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +7 | 14:7 | 15 | |
| 11 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | +6 | 15:9 | 15 | |
| 12 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 12:11 | 15 | |
| 13 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +8 | 15:7 | 14 | |
| 14 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 8:3 | 14 | |
| 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 7:6 | 14 | |
| 16 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | +4 | 15:11 | 13 | |
| 17 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +3 | 17:14 | 12 | |
| 18 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | +3 | 12:9 | 12 | |
| 19 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +3 | 10:7 | 12 | |
| 20 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +2 | 11:9 | 12 | |
| 21 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | -2 | 13:15 | 11 | |
| 22 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 12:15 | 10 | |
| 23 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | -4 | 12:16 | 10 | |
| 24 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | -2 | 9:11 | 9 | |
| 25 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -6 | 10:16 | 9 | |
| 26 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -6 | 5:11 | 7 | |
| 27 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -7 | 9:16 | 7 | |
| 28 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -8 | 6:14 | 7 | |
| 29 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -4 | 11:15 | 6 | |
| 30 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -4 | 9:13 | 6 | |
| 31 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -5 | 10:15 | 6 | |
| 32 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -9 | 5:14 | 4 | |
| 33 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -8 | 7:15 | 3 | |
| 34 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -10 | 5:15 | 1 | |
| 35 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -11 | 4:15 | 1 | |
| 36 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -20 | 2:22 | 1 |
Brann and Midtjylland faced off in a Europa League encounter that promised tactical intrigue. Both sides showcased periods of dominance, with the home team, Brann, demonstrating a potent attacking threat throughout the ninety minutes.
Brann established a strong attacking presence early on, generating a significant expected goals (xG) total of 3.32. Their build-up play was evident in their 59 attacks and 201 passes into the opposition half. The team created seven big chances, indicating clear-cut opportunities that could have altered the scoreline. Despite numerous crosses, with 9 successful out of 25 attempted, and 14 key passes, they struggled to convert this dominance into tangible goals. The attacking pressure was sustained, but the final touch or decisive pass often eluded them.
The home side's offensive statistics highlight a game where they consistently probed the Midtjylland defence. Their 11 shots on target suggest they tested the opposition goalkeeper, but the accuracy of 0.48 indicates a need for greater precision in their finishing. Brann's possession was evenly split, but their tactical approach focused on creating and exploiting attacking situations, leading to a high volume of offensive actions and a substantial expected goals figure that belied the final outcome.
Midtjylland, while perhaps not creating the same volume of high-quality chances, maintained a solid defensive structure. Their ability to win 32 aerial duels and make 15 successful tackles suggests a robust backline that worked hard to contain Brann's attacking waves. The match statistics show a competitive midfield battle, with both teams fighting for control of possession and territory. The limited number of free kicks conceded by Brann (13) points to disciplined defending when under pressure.
The game unfolded as a tactical chess match, with neither side able to decisively break the deadlock. Brann's high expected goals total suggests they were the more proactive attacking force, but Midtjylland's resilience prevented them from capitalising. The evenly split possession indicates a balanced contest where key moments and clinical finishing were ultimately the deciding factors, or lack thereof, in this European fixture.
Ultimately, the encounter was defined by Brann's sustained offensive efforts and their inability to convert chances into goals, against a Midtjylland side that defended resolutely. The statistics paint a picture of a game where Brann dominated the attacking metrics, but the final scoreline would reflect the effectiveness of both teams' defensive strategies and their respective finishing prowess on the night.