Genk vs. Freiburg Highlights (Mar 12)
Europa League 2025/26
Europa League 2025/26
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | +13 | 18:5 | 21 | |
| 2 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | +8 | 14:6 | 21 | |
| 3 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | +10 | 18:8 | 19 | |
| 4 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +6 | 13:7 | 17 | |
| 5 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +6 | 13:7 | 17 | |
| 6 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +6 | 11:5 | 17 | |
| 7 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +6 | 10:4 | 17 | |
| 8 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | +7 | 13:6 | 16 | |
| 9 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | +4 | 11:7 | 16 | |
| 10 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +7 | 14:7 | 15 | |
| 11 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | +6 | 15:9 | 15 | |
| 12 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 12:11 | 15 | |
| 13 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +8 | 15:7 | 14 | |
| 14 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 8:3 | 14 | |
| 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 7:6 | 14 | |
| 16 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | +4 | 15:11 | 13 | |
| 17 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +3 | 17:14 | 12 | |
| 18 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | +3 | 12:9 | 12 | |
| 19 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +3 | 10:7 | 12 | |
| 20 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +2 | 11:9 | 12 | |
| 21 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | -2 | 13:15 | 11 | |
| 22 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 12:15 | 10 | |
| 23 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | -4 | 12:16 | 10 | |
| 24 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | -2 | 9:11 | 9 | |
| 25 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -6 | 10:16 | 9 | |
| 26 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -6 | 5:11 | 7 | |
| 27 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -7 | 9:16 | 7 | |
| 28 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -8 | 6:14 | 7 | |
| 29 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -4 | 11:15 | 6 | |
| 30 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -4 | 9:13 | 6 | |
| 31 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -5 | 10:15 | 6 | |
| 32 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -9 | 5:14 | 4 | |
| 33 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -8 | 7:15 | 3 | |
| 34 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -10 | 5:15 | 1 | |
| 35 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -11 | 4:15 | 1 | |
| 36 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -20 | 2:22 | 1 |
Genk and Freiburg locked horns in a tense Europa League encounter. Both sides showcased tactical discipline, with the midfield battle proving crucial in dictating the tempo of this European clash. Possession was evenly split, highlighting a closely contested affair from the outset.
Genk displayed a willingness to build from the back, evidenced by their 170 passes in their own half compared to 238 in the opposition half. They attempted to stretch Freiburg with a mix of short and long passes, registering 30 successful long balls out of 55 attempts. The home side also looked to exploit the flanks with 12 crosses, though only two found their mark. Despite creating 14 key passes, Genk struggled to convert their build-up into clear-cut chances, failing to generate any big opportunities.
Freiburg, meanwhile, matched Genk's possession with their own measured approach. The visitors' defensive unit worked diligently, making 17 tackles and 11 interceptions to stifle Genk's advances. While they also focused on moving the ball forward, the final attacking thrust lacked the incisiveness to break down the Genk defence effectively. The game remained a tight tactical affair, with both teams probing for weaknesses but ultimately unable to find the decisive breakthrough.
As the match progressed, Genk increased their attacking intent, registering 53 attacks in total and 5 corners. Their expected goals figure of 0.85 suggested they were creating chances, even if the quality wasn't always high. The team's passing into the final third was a notable aspect of their play, with 83 successful passes into dangerous areas. However, their shots accuracy of 0.18 indicates a struggle to hit the target effectively when opportunities arose.
Freiburg's defensive resilience continued to be a key feature, with 32 clearances and 11 successful aerial duels demonstrating their commitment to shutting down Genk's threats. The visitors managed 12 successful dribbles, attempting to create moments of individual brilliance. Despite the efforts from both sides to find a winning goal, the match ultimately settled into a tactical stalemate. Neither team could find the clinical edge required to secure victory, leaving the outcome finely balanced.
The statistical profile of the game paints a picture of a hard-fought contest. While Genk had a slight edge in attacking statistics like passes into the final third and key passes, Freiburg's defensive solidity prevented them from capitalizing. The evenly matched nature of the encounter was reflected in the possession statistics, with neither side able to assert sustained dominance over the other throughout the 90 minutes.
