Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
LaLiga 2025/26
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 31 | 1 | 6 | +59 | 95:36 | 94 | |
| 2 | 38 | 27 | 5 | 6 | +42 | 77:35 | 86 | |
| 3 | 38 | 22 | 6 | 10 | +26 | 72:46 | 72 | |
| 4 | 38 | 21 | 6 | 11 | +18 | 62:44 | 69 | |
| 5 | 38 | 15 | 15 | 8 | +11 | 59:48 | 60 | |
| 6 | 38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | +5 | 53:48 | 54 | |
| 7 | 38 | 15 | 6 | 17 | -6 | 32:38 | 51 | |
| 8 | 38 | 12 | 14 | 12 | -3 | 41:44 | 50 | |
| 9 | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | -9 | 46:55 | 49 | |
| 10 | 38 | 11 | 13 | 14 | -2 | 59:61 | 46 | |
| 11 | 38 | 12 | 10 | 16 | -12 | 43:55 | 46 | |
| 12 | 38 | 13 | 6 | 19 | -15 | 43:58 | 45 | |
| 13 | 38 | 12 | 7 | 19 | -14 | 46:60 | 43 | |
| 14 | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | -12 | 44:56 | 43 | |
| 15 | 38 | 10 | 13 | 15 | -8 | 49:57 | 43 | |
| 16 | 38 | 11 | 9 | 18 | -14 | 47:61 | 42 | |
| 17 | 38 | 11 | 9 | 18 | -6 | 44:50 | 42 | |
| 18 | 38 | 11 | 9 | 18 | -10 | 47:57 | 42 | |
| 19 | 38 | 9 | 14 | 15 | -16 | 39:55 | 41 | |
| 20 | 38 | 6 | 11 | 21 | -34 | 26:60 | 29 |
Levante hosted Atlético Madrid in a LaLiga clash on January 31, 2026. Both teams sought crucial points in the league standings, with the atmosphere buzzing ahead of kick-off. The match promised tactical battles and individual brilliance.
Levante controlled possession for significant portions of the opening period, aiming to build attacks through patient passing. Their build-up play often involved moving the ball across their own half before attempting to progress forward. Despite achieving 45% possession, their attacking output was limited, reflected in a low expected goals (xG) figure. They managed only a couple of shots on target and failed to create any big chances, indicating Atlético's solid defensive structure. The hosts attempted to utilize the flanks, delivering seven crosses into the box, though only one found its intended target. Their passing game saw them accumulate 201 passes in the opposition half, but the final ball or decisive action was often lacking. Atlético, meanwhile, appeared content to absorb pressure, focusing on maintaining their shape and limiting Levante's clear-cut opportunities.
The midfield battle was keenly contested, with both sides looking to gain an advantage. Levante's approach involved a high number of backward passes, suggesting a cautious build-up strategy. Atlético's defensive unit, marshaled by their experienced backline, worked diligently to disrupt Levante's rhythm and prevent them from penetrating dangerous areas. The statistics showed a tight contest, with few clear openings emerging for either side as the first half drew to a close.
As the match progressed, Atlético Madrid maintained their disciplined defensive shape, making it difficult for Levante to find space in behind. The home side continued to probe, registering five key passes and attempting to unlock the Atlético defense. However, their efforts were consistently thwarted, with Atlético's defenders making 15 tackles and 6 interceptions to break up play and regain possession. The game remained a tense affair, with both teams struggling to assert dominance. Levante's attacking statistics, including an expected goals (xG) value of 0.37, underscored their difficulties in converting possession into tangible threats. They had two shots on target from a total of four attempts, with their offensive actions not quite reaching the required intensity. The team's statistical output, such as 45 passes into the final third and 16 dribbles, highlighted their attempts to create openings but ultimately fell short of breaking down a resolute Atlético Madrid defense.
The closing stages saw a slight increase in the intensity, though clear-cut chances remained at a premium. Atlético's tactical approach focused on nullifying Levante's attacking threats, ensuring they didn't concede. The game concluded with both teams unable to find the decisive breakthrough, reflecting the tight nature of the contest and the effectiveness of Atlético's defensive strategy throughout the ninety minutes. The draw, while perhaps not ideal for either side's ambitions, was a fair reflection of the on-field action.
