Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2026
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 16 | 4 | 2 | +30 | 47:17 | 52 | |
| 2 | 22 | 12 | 6 | 4 | +15 | 56:41 | 42 | |
| 3 | 21 | 11 | 4 | 6 | +11 | 39:28 | 37 | |
| 4 | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | +9 | 36:27 | 37 | |
| 5 | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | +8 | 40:32 | 35 | |
| 6 | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | -2 | 49:51 | 31 | |
| 7 | 22 | 7 | 7 | 8 | +5 | 36:31 | 28 | |
| 8 | 22 | 7 | 5 | 10 | -14 | 32:46 | 26 | |
| 9 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 11 | -17 | 37:54 | 25 | |
| 10 | 22 | 5 | 10 | 7 | -6 | 32:38 | 25 | |
| 11 | 22 | 5 | 10 | 7 | -8 | 28:36 | 25 | |
| 12 | 22 | 6 | 6 | 10 | -5 | 34:39 | 24 | |
| 13 | 22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | -13 | 25:38 | 21 | |
| 14 | 22 | 5 | 6 | 11 | -16 | 30:46 | 21 | |
| 15 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 12 | -8 | 31:39 | 20 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | 13 | 4 | 4 | +30 | 48:18 | 43 | |
| 2 | 22 | 12 | 3 | 7 | +4 | 30:26 | 39 | |
| 3 | 23 | 10 | 6 | 7 | +14 | 36:22 | 36 | |
| 4 | 22 | 10 | 4 | 8 | +6 | 39:33 | 34 | |
| 5 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | +4 | 41:37 | 34 | |
| 6 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | +3 | 33:30 | 34 | |
| 7 | 22 | 10 | 1 | 11 | +3 | 31:28 | 31 | |
| 8 | 22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | +7 | 40:33 | 30 | |
| 9 | 22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | -2 | 30:32 | 29 | |
| 10 | 21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | +1 | 34:33 | 28 | |
| 11 | 22 | 8 | 4 | 10 | +0 | 39:39 | 28 | |
| 12 | 21 | 7 | 5 | 9 | -5 | 24:29 | 26 | |
| 13 | 23 | 6 | 8 | 9 | -7 | 28:35 | 26 | |
| 14 | 22 | 6 | 6 | 10 | -13 | 28:41 | 24 | |
| 15 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 15 | -34 | 20:54 | 15 |
Charlotte FC and Toronto FC battled fiercely in a 2026 MLS encounter, with both sides showcasing attacking intent. The match statistics reveal a competitive affair, hinting at moments of tactical pressure and build-up play from both Charlotte and Toronto throughout the ninety minutes.
Charlotte FC demonstrated significant attacking ambition, generating an expected goals (xG) total of 2.12. Their build-up play led to numerous attacks, with the team creating two big chances and registering 94 passes into the opposition half. Despite a strong presence in the attacking third and 15 crosses, the final product often eluded them, with only 6 shots on target from their 7 attempts. The team's successful passes stood at 372, indicating a good level of possession and ball circulation in their quest for a breakthrough.
The home side's ability to get into dangerous areas was evident, supported by 14 key passes and an expected assists (xA) figure of 1.49. However, converting these opportunities into tangible results proved challenging. The statistics suggest a game where Charlotte controlled large parts of the play, pushing forward with intent and looking to exploit the Toronto defense. Their 7 corners also point to sustained periods of pressure, but the Toronto backline managed to hold firm against the onslaught, preventing clear-cut goals.
Toronto FC, while perhaps not matching Charlotte's statistical output in some attacking metrics, showed resilience. Their defensive efforts were tested, with Charlotte's 92 attacks and numerous crosses indicating a constant threat. Toronto's ability to limit Charlotte's shots on target to just 6, despite the high number of attacks and big chances created by the home side, speaks to their defensive organization. The visitors focused on staying compact and weathering the storm, aiming to capitalize on any rare opportunities.
The match statistics reveal a game where Charlotte dominated possession with 0.46 share and worked hard to break down Toronto's defense. Their 15 crosses and 12 dribbles highlight their attempts to create space and find an opening. However, the lack of decisive finishing and Toronto's solid defensive shape meant Charlotte's attacking endeavors ultimately fell short. The game remained a tense affair, with both teams battling for control and looking for that crucial moment to swing the game in their favor.
