Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2026
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | 16 | 5 | 2 | +30 | 47:17 | 53 | |
| 2 | 23 | 12 | 7 | 4 | +15 | 58:43 | 43 | |
| 3 | 22 | 11 | 5 | 6 | +11 | 43:32 | 38 | |
| 4 | 23 | 11 | 4 | 8 | +8 | 37:29 | 37 | |
| 5 | 23 | 10 | 6 | 7 | +8 | 40:32 | 36 | |
| 6 | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | -2 | 49:51 | 31 | |
| 7 | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | +5 | 36:31 | 29 | |
| 8 | 23 | 8 | 4 | 11 | -16 | 38:54 | 28 | |
| 9 | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | -3 | 36:39 | 27 | |
| 10 | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | -14 | 32:46 | 27 | |
| 11 | 23 | 5 | 11 | 7 | -6 | 36:42 | 26 | |
| 12 | 22 | 5 | 10 | 7 | -8 | 28:36 | 25 | |
| 13 | 23 | 6 | 5 | 12 | -5 | 34:39 | 23 | |
| 14 | 23 | 6 | 4 | 13 | -13 | 27:40 | 22 | |
| 15 | 23 | 5 | 6 | 12 | -18 | 30:48 | 21 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 13 | 4 | 5 | +28 | 49:21 | 43 | |
| 2 | 23 | 12 | 4 | 7 | +4 | 30:26 | 40 | |
| 3 | 24 | 10 | 7 | 7 | +14 | 38:24 | 37 | |
| 4 | 23 | 10 | 7 | 6 | +5 | 45:40 | 37 | |
| 5 | 23 | 10 | 7 | 6 | +5 | 36:31 | 37 | |
| 6 | 23 | 10 | 5 | 8 | +6 | 40:34 | 35 | |
| 7 | 23 | 9 | 4 | 10 | +1 | 43:42 | 31 | |
| 8 | 23 | 10 | 1 | 12 | +0 | 31:31 | 31 | |
| 9 | 23 | 8 | 6 | 9 | +6 | 40:34 | 30 | |
| 10 | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | +1 | 36:35 | 29 | |
| 11 | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | -3 | 33:36 | 29 | |
| 12 | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | -6 | 30:36 | 29 | |
| 13 | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | -5 | 24:29 | 27 | |
| 14 | 23 | 6 | 7 | 10 | -13 | 29:42 | 25 | |
| 15 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 16 | -35 | 23:58 | 15 |
Toronto FC vs. Chicago Fire FC highlights from MLS 2026, Sept 6.
The match between Toronto FC and Chicago Fire FC concluded with Chicago Fire FC securing a victory. Chicago Fire FC held a significant advantage in possession, controlling 57% of the game compared to Toronto FC's 43%. This possession dominance was reflected in their attacking statistics, as Chicago Fire FC created more big chances, with 4 compared to Toronto FC's 2.
Despite Toronto FC having more shots on target (8 vs 6) and a higher number of total shots (18 vs 15), Chicago Fire FC's chances were of higher quality, indicated by their expected goals (xG) of 1.92, which was greater than Toronto FC's 1.28. Chicago Fire FC also recorded more goalkeeper saves, with 4 compared to Toronto FC's 3, suggesting they faced more direct threats on goal despite Toronto FC's higher shot count.
Both teams maintained discipline throughout the match, with neither receiving any red cards. The game saw a total of 33 shots attempted between the two sides, with Toronto FC managing 18 and Chicago Fire FC 15. Chicago Fire FC's efficiency in converting their opportunities, coupled with their ability to create higher-quality chances, ultimately proved decisive in the contest.
