| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 27 | 6 | 5 | +54 | 89:35 | 87 | |
| 2 | 38 | 23 | 7 | 8 | +22 | 58:36 | 76 | |
| 3 | 38 | 23 | 4 | 11 | +28 | 59:31 | 73 | |
| 4 | 38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | +36 | 65:29 | 71 | |
| 5 | 38 | 20 | 10 | 8 | +18 | 53:35 | 70 | |
| 6 | 38 | 19 | 12 | 7 | +27 | 61:34 | 69 | |
| 7 | 38 | 15 | 14 | 9 | +15 | 51:36 | 59 | |
| 8 | 38 | 16 | 8 | 14 | +3 | 49:46 | 56 | |
| 9 | 38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | +1 | 41:40 | 54 | |
| 10 | 38 | 14 | 8 | 16 | -3 | 45:48 | 50 | |
| 11 | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | -4 | 46:50 | 49 | |
| 12 | 38 | 12 | 9 | 17 | -19 | 44:63 | 45 | |
| 13 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | -18 | 28:46 | 45 | |
| 14 | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | -13 | 40:53 | 43 | |
| 15 | 38 | 9 | 15 | 14 | -9 | 41:50 | 42 | |
| 16 | 38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | -10 | 41:51 | 41 | |
| 17 | 38 | 10 | 8 | 20 | -22 | 28:50 | 38 | |
| 18 | 38 | 8 | 10 | 20 | -25 | 32:57 | 34 | |
| 19 | 38 | 3 | 12 | 23 | -36 | 25:61 | 21 | |
| 20 | 38 | 2 | 12 | 24 | -45 | 26:71 | 18 |
A closely contested Serie A encounter between Parma and Pisa unfolded on April 25, 2026. Both sides battled fiercely for dominance, showcasing tactical discipline and a desire to control possession throughout the ninety minutes.
Parma asserted a slight edge in possession, controlling 51% of the ball and aiming to build attacks through patient build-up. They moved the ball effectively into the opposition half, completing 230 passes in advanced areas. The home side attempted to unlock the Pisa defence with 63 passes into the final third, indicating a clear intent to create scoring opportunities. Their efforts resulted in 9 key passes and 5 shots on target, demonstrating a consistent threat.
The Gialloblù registered an expected goals (xG) tally of 1.57, suggesting they created chances of reasonable quality. Despite creating one big chance, they were unable to convert their territorial advantage and attacking pressure into goals. Parma's approach involved a mix of short passing and 14 successful long passes from 36 attempts, showcasing a desire to vary their attacking strategy and exploit different areas of the pitch.
Pisa, while seeing less of the ball, remained a disciplined unit, working hard to disrupt Parma's rhythm. Their defensive efforts were evident in their 25 clearances and 10 tackles, with 6 successfully won. The team focused on restricting Parma's progress, particularly in wide areas, as suggested by their 17 crosses faced and only 2 successful crosses conceded. This defensive solidity aimed to frustrate Parma's attacking ambitions throughout the match.
Despite Parma's higher xG and more shots on target, the game remained a tight affair. The 7 corners awarded to Parma and their 19 free kicks highlight the pressure they applied, but Pisa's backline held firm. Both teams showed moments of attacking intent, but ultimately, the clinical edge required to break the deadlock was missing from both sides, leading to a stalemate on the scoreboard.
The match statistics reveal a game where Parma had more of the ball and created more direct threats, evidenced by their higher expected goals and key passes. However, Pisa's defensive organization and commitment prevented Parma from capitalizing. The game was characterized by a strong midfield battle and strategic attempts to find openings, but neither side could find the decisive moment to secure victory.
