Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2026
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | 15 | 4 | 2 | +26 | 43:17 | 49 | |
| 2 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | +9 | 49:40 | 39 | |
| 3 | 20 | 11 | 3 | 6 | +11 | 37:26 | 36 | |
| 4 | 20 | 10 | 3 | 7 | +7 | 32:25 | 33 | |
| 5 | 21 | 9 | 5 | 7 | +6 | 38:32 | 32 | |
| 6 | 21 | 8 | 7 | 6 | +2 | 49:47 | 31 | |
| 7 | 20 | 7 | 5 | 8 | +5 | 34:29 | 26 | |
| 8 | 21 | 7 | 5 | 9 | -12 | 31:43 | 26 | |
| 9 | 21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | -17 | 34:51 | 24 | |
| 10 | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 | -6 | 31:37 | 24 | |
| 11 | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 | -8 | 28:36 | 24 | |
| 12 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | -7 | 31:38 | 21 | |
| 13 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | -10 | 29:39 | 21 | |
| 14 | 21 | 5 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 30:36 | 20 | |
| 15 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 12 | -12 | 23:35 | 18 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 12 | 4 | 4 | +27 | 45:18 | 40 | |
| 2 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 7 | +4 | 30:26 | 38 | |
| 3 | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | +14 | 36:22 | 35 | |
| 4 | 21 | 10 | 3 | 8 | +6 | 39:33 | 33 | |
| 5 | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | +4 | 38:34 | 33 | |
| 6 | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | +3 | 30:27 | 33 | |
| 7 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 11 | +2 | 30:28 | 28 | |
| 8 | 20 | 8 | 4 | 8 | +2 | 34:32 | 28 | |
| 9 | 21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | +1 | 38:37 | 28 | |
| 10 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 7 | -2 | 27:29 | 28 | |
| 11 | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | +5 | 37:32 | 27 | |
| 12 | 22 | 6 | 8 | 8 | -5 | 27:32 | 26 | |
| 13 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 22:27 | 25 | |
| 14 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | -14 | 26:40 | 21 | |
| 15 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 13 | -30 | 19:49 | 15 |
A tightly contested MLS clash saw San Jose Earthquakes host Minnesota United. Both sides aimed to assert dominance early, with the Quakes looking to leverage their home advantage against a resilient Loons outfit in this 2026 encounter.
The San Jose Earthquakes sought to control possession, pushing into the opposition's half with a notable 238 passes compared to Minnesota's 188 in their attacking third. Their build-up play generated a respectable expected goals (xG) figure of 1.72, indicating a promising offensive output. Despite creating two big chances, the Earthquakes struggled to convert their territorial advantage into a decisive lead, facing a determined Minnesota defense that worked hard to stifle their advances and limit clear-cut opportunities throughout the initial stages of the match.
Minnesota United, while seeing less of the ball with 0.59 possession, focused on defensive solidity and opportunistic moments. Their tactical approach aimed to disrupt San Jose's rhythm, forcing errors and seeking to exploit any defensive lapses. The Earthquakes' attacking forays were met with firm resistance, as evidenced by Minnesota's 21 tackles and 10 interceptions, showcasing a commitment to winning the ball back and preventing San Jose from establishing a firm grip on the game's outcome.
As the match progressed, the intensity remained high, with both teams demonstrating a strong work rate. San Jose continued to probe, registering 83 passes into the final third and attempting 17 crosses, though only three found their mark successfully. This persistent pressure, coupled with 6 shots on target, suggested a team actively seeking a breakthrough. The expected assists figure of 1.06 also points towards a level of creativity that, unfortunately, didn't translate into tangible rewards on the scoreboard.
The statistics paint a picture of a game where San Jose Earthquakes held a slight edge in attacking intent and possession, but Minnesota United's defensive structure and resilience prevented them from capitalizing fully. The overall expected goals of 1.72 for the Quakes indicate they were in positions to score, yet the final product was lacking. The encounter was characterized by a constant battle for midfield control and a struggle to break down organized defenses, ultimately leading to a stalemate.
Ultimately, the match was a testament to defensive organization and the fine margins in football. Despite generating more attacking impetus and controlling possession for significant periods, San Jose Earthquakes couldn't find the decisive touch. Minnesota United's resolute defending and ability to absorb pressure ensured they remained competitive throughout, leaving both sides to reflect on what might have been in this closely fought MLS fixture.