Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 27 | 6 | 5 | +54 | 89:35 | 87 | |
| 2 | 38 | 23 | 7 | 8 | +22 | 58:36 | 76 | |
| 3 | 38 | 23 | 4 | 11 | +28 | 59:31 | 73 | |
| 4 | 38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | +36 | 65:29 | 71 | |
| 5 | 38 | 20 | 10 | 8 | +18 | 53:35 | 70 | |
| 6 | 38 | 19 | 12 | 7 | +27 | 61:34 | 69 | |
| 7 | 38 | 15 | 14 | 9 | +15 | 51:36 | 59 | |
| 8 | 38 | 16 | 8 | 14 | +3 | 49:46 | 56 | |
| 9 | 38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | +1 | 41:40 | 54 | |
| 10 | 38 | 14 | 8 | 16 | -3 | 45:48 | 50 | |
| 11 | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | -4 | 46:50 | 49 | |
| 12 | 38 | 12 | 9 | 17 | -19 | 44:63 | 45 | |
| 13 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | -18 | 28:46 | 45 | |
| 14 | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | -13 | 40:53 | 43 | |
| 15 | 38 | 9 | 15 | 14 | -9 | 41:50 | 42 | |
| 16 | 38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | -10 | 41:51 | 41 | |
| 17 | 38 | 10 | 8 | 20 | -22 | 28:50 | 38 | |
| 18 | 38 | 8 | 10 | 20 | -25 | 32:57 | 34 | |
| 19 | 38 | 3 | 12 | 23 | -36 | 25:61 | 21 | |
| 20 | 38 | 2 | 12 | 24 | -45 | 26:71 | 18 |
Como and Pisa locked horns in a Serie A 2025/26 encounter on March 22, 2026. The match promised tactical intrigue as both sides aimed to assert dominance in the league standings.
Como asserted significant control throughout the match, evidenced by their commanding 73% possession. They utilized this territorial advantage effectively, completing 633 passes and frequently venturing into the opposition half, with 417 passes registered there. Their build-up play was characterized by a willingness to probe, as indicated by 134 passes into the final third. The team created 11 key passes, suggesting a consistent effort to unlock Pisa's defense and generate scoring opportunities.
The attacking output from Como was notable, with 1.49 expected goals and 2 big chances created. Their 7 shots on target tested the Pisa goalkeeper, while another 6 efforts went off target. The team’s attacking strategy involved 20 crosses, with 5 finding their mark, indicating attempts to exploit wide areas. Despite the pressure, Como's 7 corners and 2 offsides suggest that Pisa managed to weather some of the storm.
Pisa's defensive unit worked diligently to contain Como's expansive play, making 21 tackles and achieving 14 successful ones. They also registered 24 clearances and won 9 aerial duels, demonstrating resilience in crucial moments. Despite the high volume of passes from Como, Pisa managed to limit the effectiveness of their final ball, forcing several blocked shots and wayward attempts. The team's structure seemed geared towards absorbing pressure and looking for opportunities on the counter.
While Como enjoyed the lion's share of possession and created more significant chances, Pisa's defensive solidity prevented them from fully capitalizing. The statistics show Como's 1.26 expected assists, indicating that their build-up play was often close to yielding a goal, but the final product was not always clinical. The match ultimately highlighted Como's attacking ambition against Pisa's determined defensive efforts, with the outcome hanging in the balance for much of the contest.
