Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 27 | 6 | 5 | +54 | 89:35 | 87 | |
| 2 | 38 | 23 | 7 | 8 | +22 | 58:36 | 76 | |
| 3 | 38 | 23 | 4 | 11 | +28 | 59:31 | 73 | |
| 4 | 38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | +36 | 65:29 | 71 | |
| 5 | 38 | 20 | 10 | 8 | +18 | 53:35 | 70 | |
| 6 | 38 | 19 | 12 | 7 | +27 | 61:34 | 69 | |
| 7 | 38 | 15 | 14 | 9 | +15 | 51:36 | 59 | |
| 8 | 38 | 16 | 8 | 14 | +3 | 49:46 | 56 | |
| 9 | 38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | +1 | 41:40 | 54 | |
| 10 | 38 | 14 | 8 | 16 | -3 | 45:48 | 50 | |
| 11 | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | -4 | 46:50 | 49 | |
| 12 | 38 | 12 | 9 | 17 | -19 | 44:63 | 45 | |
| 13 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | -18 | 28:46 | 45 | |
| 14 | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | -13 | 40:53 | 43 | |
| 15 | 38 | 9 | 15 | 14 | -9 | 41:50 | 42 | |
| 16 | 38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | -10 | 41:51 | 41 | |
| 17 | 38 | 10 | 8 | 20 | -22 | 28:50 | 38 | |
| 18 | 38 | 8 | 10 | 20 | -25 | 32:57 | 34 | |
| 19 | 38 | 3 | 12 | 23 | -36 | 25:61 | 21 | |
| 20 | 38 | 2 | 12 | 24 | -45 | 26:71 | 18 |
Cremonese asserted dominance against Pisa in a Serie A clash, leveraging extensive possession and a clear attacking intent. The home side's strategy focused on building play through the midfield and exploiting the flanks, aiming to break down Pisa's defense. The intensity was palpable from the outset as both teams sought an early advantage.
Cremonese controlled the lion's share of possession, dictating the tempo of the match with a significant advantage in their own half and a clear focus on advancing into opposition territory. Their build-up play was characterized by a high number of passes, with a substantial portion successfully reaching the final third. This territorial dominance translated into a higher volume of attacking actions, including several key passes and crosses, as they probed for openings. The team's tactical approach emphasized patient build-up, aiming to create space and opportunities through sustained pressure.
The statistics reveal a clear pattern of Cremonese's attacking ambition. With a healthy expected goals figure and multiple big chances created, they consistently threatened the Pisa goal. Their ability to win aerial duels and their successful dribbles indicated a willingness to engage in direct contests and take on defenders. Despite facing a determined Pisa side, Cremonese's sustained pressure and offensive statistics suggested a strong performance, even if the final breakthrough remained elusive in this phase of the game.
Throughout the encounter, Cremonese maintained their high level of possession, consistently pushing forward and accumulating passes in the opponent's half. Their strategy involved a significant number of successful crosses, though the conversion rate into dangerous chances remained a point of contention. The team's expected assists figure also highlighted their consistent efforts to create scoring opportunities for their forwards. Free kicks were a notable feature of their attacking set-piece strategy, offering alternative routes to goal.
Pisa, meanwhile, focused on defensive solidity, as evidenced by their number of clearances and successful tackles. While Cremonese dominated the ball, Pisa's defensive organization aimed to limit the effectiveness of their opponent's advances. The match statistics suggest a game where Cremonese consistently applied pressure and created a higher volume of attacking situations, relying on their possession-based approach to break down the opposition's structure. The final outcome would hinge on whether Cremonese could convert their statistical advantages into tangible results.
