Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2026
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 12 | 4 | 2 | +21 | 35:14 | 40 | |
| 2 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 2 | +13 | 45:32 | 38 | |
| 3 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | +7 | 28:21 | 30 | |
| 4 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 6 | +9 | 32:23 | 29 | |
| 5 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | +7 | 31:24 | 26 | |
| 6 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | +1 | 45:44 | 26 | |
| 7 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | +2 | 29:27 | 25 | |
| 8 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | -10 | 29:39 | 25 | |
| 9 | 18 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -3 | 26:29 | 23 | |
| 10 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 8 | -2 | 26:28 | 20 | |
| 11 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 10 | -17 | 30:47 | 20 | |
| 12 | 18 | 3 | 8 | 7 | -8 | 24:32 | 17 | |
| 13 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -8 | 25:33 | 16 | |
| 14 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -11 | 24:35 | 16 | |
| 15 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -14 | 19:33 | 12 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | 10 | 4 | 3 | +21 | 38:17 | 34 | |
| 2 | 19 | 10 | 4 | 5 | +16 | 35:19 | 34 | |
| 3 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 5 | +13 | 37:24 | 33 | |
| 4 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 6 | +1 | 25:24 | 29 | |
| 5 | 18 | 7 | 6 | 5 | +7 | 32:25 | 27 | |
| 6 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | +4 | 29:25 | 27 | |
| 7 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | +0 | 24:24 | 26 | |
| 8 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | -1 | 20:21 | 25 | |
| 9 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 6 | -5 | 20:25 | 24 | |
| 10 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 10 | +2 | 27:25 | 22 | |
| 11 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 8 | -1 | 32:33 | 22 | |
| 12 | 19 | 5 | 7 | 7 | -5 | 24:29 | 22 | |
| 13 | 18 | 5 | 6 | 7 | +3 | 32:29 | 21 | |
| 14 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 9 | -14 | 22:36 | 17 | |
| 15 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -28 | 18:46 | 14 |
A vibrant MLS clash unfolded as St. Louis CITY SC hosted Real Salt Lake. Both sides aimed to assert dominance, with the home team seeking to leverage their possession advantage and create scoring opportunities through intricate build-up play.
St. Louis CITY SC established a strong foothold in the match, dictating play with an impressive 67% possession. Their strategy involved patient build-up, evident in their 488 passes into the opposition half and 237 passes into the final third. This sustained pressure created a promising attacking platform, with the team generating an expected goals (xG) value of 1.71, suggesting a solid offensive output throughout the initial phase of the game. The high number of attacks, 131, underscored their intent to break down Real Salt Lake's defense.
The home side's attacking endeavors were further highlighted by their ability to create key chances, reflected in 15 key passes and 2 big chances. Despite the attacking intent and a significant number of crosses attempted (31), converting these opportunities into concrete goals remained the challenge. The team's passing accuracy was notable, with 581 successful passes contributing to their control of the game, while 16 successful long passes indicated a willingness to switch play and exploit different areas of the pitch.
Real Salt Lake, while operating with less possession, focused on defensive solidity and opportunistic moments. Their tactical approach aimed to absorb St. Louis's pressure and look for ways to counter. Despite facing a dominant possession side, their defensive organization was key in limiting the direct impact of St. Louis's attacking forays. The match statistics suggest a contest where St. Louis controlled the tempo and territory, but Real Salt Lake's structure aimed to frustrate their opponents and remain in contention.
St. Louis continued to probe for openings, with their 1.71 expected goals indicating a significant threat that Real Salt Lake's defense had to navigate. The home team's 9 corners and 15 key passes were further testament to their sustained offensive pressure. However, with only 4 shots on target from their 131 attacks and a shot accuracy of 0.2, they struggled to translate their territorial advantage and possession into decisive moments on the scoreboard, highlighting the effectiveness of Real Salt Lake's defensive efforts in a tightly contested encounter.
