Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2026
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 12 | 4 | 2 | +21 | 35:14 | 40 | |
| 2 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 2 | +13 | 45:32 | 38 | |
| 3 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | +7 | 28:21 | 30 | |
| 4 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 6 | +9 | 32:23 | 29 | |
| 5 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | +7 | 31:24 | 26 | |
| 6 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | +1 | 45:44 | 26 | |
| 7 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | +2 | 29:27 | 25 | |
| 8 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | -10 | 29:39 | 25 | |
| 9 | 18 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -3 | 26:29 | 23 | |
| 10 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 8 | -2 | 26:28 | 20 | |
| 11 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 10 | -17 | 30:47 | 20 | |
| 12 | 18 | 3 | 8 | 7 | -8 | 24:32 | 17 | |
| 13 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -8 | 25:33 | 16 | |
| 14 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -11 | 24:35 | 16 | |
| 15 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -14 | 19:33 | 12 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | 10 | 4 | 3 | +21 | 38:17 | 34 | |
| 2 | 19 | 10 | 4 | 5 | +16 | 35:19 | 34 | |
| 3 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 5 | +13 | 37:24 | 33 | |
| 4 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 6 | +1 | 25:24 | 29 | |
| 5 | 18 | 7 | 6 | 5 | +7 | 32:25 | 27 | |
| 6 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | +4 | 29:25 | 27 | |
| 7 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | +0 | 24:24 | 26 | |
| 8 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | -1 | 20:21 | 25 | |
| 9 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 6 | -5 | 20:25 | 24 | |
| 10 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 10 | +2 | 27:25 | 22 | |
| 11 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 8 | -1 | 32:33 | 22 | |
| 12 | 19 | 5 | 7 | 7 | -5 | 24:29 | 22 | |
| 13 | 18 | 5 | 6 | 7 | +3 | 32:29 | 21 | |
| 14 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 9 | -14 | 22:36 | 17 | |
| 15 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -28 | 18:46 | 14 |
A fiercely contested MLS clash saw Chicago Fire FC host Charlotte FC on August 2nd, 2026. Both sides entered the fixture aiming to assert dominance, with the Fire looking to capitalize on home advantage and Charlotte seeking crucial points on the road. The atmosphere was electric as the teams took to the pitch, setting the stage for a compelling encounter.
Chicago Fire FC showcased a clear attacking ambition throughout the initial phase of the match. With a possession share hovering around 46%, they focused on building play through the opposition half, registering a notable 275 passes in that zone. Their efforts translated into creating 3 big chances and an expected goals (xG) tally of 1.62, indicating a solid offensive output. The Fire's build-up play involved a mix of shorter passes and 51 long passes, with 23 successfully finding their targets, demonstrating a desire to stretch the Charlotte defense.
Despite the Fire's offensive pressure, Charlotte FC's defensive structure held firm, limiting the hosts' clear-cut opportunities. The visitors absorbed the pressure, focusing on maintaining their shape and looking for moments to counter. While the statistics don't detail specific defensive actions for Charlotte, their ability to prevent the Fire from converting their chances suggests organized defending and effective midfield work. The game remained a tight affair, with neither side able to break the deadlock.
The second period saw a continuation of the tactical battle, with both teams pushing for an advantage. Chicago Fire FC continued to press, their 71 attacks and 14 key passes underscoring their persistent efforts to find an opening. They managed to get 5 shots on target from their 18 crosses, showing a willingness to test the opposing goalkeeper. The team's ability to consistently move the ball into the final third, with 108 passes, kept Charlotte under pressure for extended periods.
Charlotte FC, while perhaps seeing less of the ball, remained a threat, looking to exploit any defensive lapses from the Fire. The match statistics indicate a game where chances were created, but clinical finishing proved elusive for both sides. The pressure remained high as the clock ticked down, with neither team willing to concede ground. The intensity of the contest was palpable, reflecting the importance of the points at stake in the MLS season.
Ultimately, the encounter was defined by the fine margins of professional football. Chicago Fire FC generated a promising xG of 1.62 and created significant attacking threats, but Charlotte FC's resolute defense and the general lack of cutting edge from both teams meant the match remained goalless. The final whistle blew on a contest that, while lacking goals, provided plenty of tactical intrigue and a testament to the competitive nature of MLS.