Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 24 | 4 | 6 | +45 | 74:29 | 76 | |
| 2 | 34 | 22 | 4 | 8 | +31 | 66:35 | 70 | |
| 3 | 34 | 18 | 7 | 9 | +15 | 52:37 | 61 | |
| 4 | 34 | 18 | 6 | 10 | +13 | 53:40 | 60 | |
| 5 | 34 | 18 | 5 | 11 | +18 | 63:45 | 59 | |
| 6 | 34 | 17 | 8 | 9 | +9 | 59:50 | 59 | |
| 7 | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | +6 | 60:54 | 54 | |
| 8 | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | +11 | 58:47 | 53 | |
| 9 | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | +1 | 47:46 | 45 | |
| 10 | 34 | 11 | 12 | 11 | -3 | 48:51 | 45 | |
| 11 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -3 | 47:50 | 44 | |
| 12 | 34 | 10 | 9 | 15 | -12 | 43:55 | 39 | |
| 13 | 34 | 9 | 9 | 16 | -19 | 29:48 | 36 | |
| 14 | 34 | 7 | 14 | 13 | -12 | 32:44 | 35 | |
| 15 | 34 | 8 | 10 | 16 | -10 | 34:44 | 34 | |
| 16 | 34 | 7 | 11 | 16 | -23 | 37:60 | 32 | |
| 17 | 34 | 5 | 9 | 20 | -23 | 29:52 | 24 | |
| 18 | 34 | 3 | 8 | 23 | -44 | 32:76 | 17 |
In a tense Ligue 1 encounter on April 18, 2026, Angers and Le Havre locked horns in a battle for crucial points. The Stade Raymond Kopa was alive with anticipation as both sides sought to assert dominance in this late-season fixture.
Angers, playing at home, saw a significant portion of possession in the opposition half, indicating a drive to create chances. Their build-up play saw them successfully complete 215 passes in the attacking third, with 96 of those finding their way into dangerous areas. Despite creating a respectable expected goals tally of 1.06, the Le Havre defense remained resolute. The home side's attacking efforts, however, were somewhat blunted by a low success rate in crosses, managing only two successful deliveries from twenty-one attempts.
The Angers midfield, featuring the likes of Van den Boomen and Belkebla, worked tirelessly to unlock the Le Havre backline. Their passing game, while extensive, saw a notable number of failed attempts, suggesting a struggle to find the decisive final ball. The team's 20 free kicks highlight the physical nature of the contest and the defensive pressure applied by Le Havre, who looked to contain Angers' offensive forays and disrupt their rhythm in the attacking third.
Le Havre, conversely, demonstrated a strong defensive organization throughout the match. While their attacking statistics were less prominent, their ability to limit Angers' clear-cut opportunities was evident. The visitors' tactical approach likely focused on absorbing pressure and looking for moments to strike, although the provided statistics do not detail specific attacking threats initiated by Le Havre.
The visitors' defensive efforts were underscored by their successful tackles and aerial duels, indicating a commitment to winning individual battles and regaining possession. Despite Angers' efforts to penetrate their lines, Le Havre's structure appeared to hold firm, frustrating the home team's offensive ambitions. The match statistics suggest a keenly contested affair where defensive discipline played a significant role in shaping the overall narrative on the pitch.
