Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2025
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 20 | 6 | 8 | +22 | 57:35 | 66 | |
| 2 | 34 | 20 | 5 | 9 | +12 | 52:40 | 65 | |
| 3 | 34 | 19 | 8 | 7 | +26 | 81:55 | 65 | |
| 4 | 34 | 19 | 2 | 13 | +9 | 55:46 | 59 | |
| 5 | 34 | 17 | 5 | 12 | +6 | 50:44 | 56 | |
| 6 | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | +13 | 58:45 | 54 | |
| 7 | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 55:51 | 54 | |
| 8 | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | +8 | 68:60 | 53 | |
| 9 | 34 | 14 | 11 | 9 | +12 | 63:51 | 53 | |
| 10 | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | +1 | 48:47 | 43 | |
| 11 | 34 | 9 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 44:51 | 36 | |
| 12 | 34 | 6 | 14 | 14 | -7 | 37:44 | 32 | |
| 13 | 34 | 6 | 10 | 18 | -26 | 34:60 | 28 | |
| 14 | 34 | 5 | 13 | 16 | -25 | 38:63 | 28 | |
| 15 | 34 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -36 | 30:66 | 26 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 19 | 6 | 9 | +23 | 64:41 | 63 | |
| 2 | 34 | 18 | 9 | 7 | +28 | 66:38 | 63 | |
| 3 | 34 | 17 | 9 | 8 | +25 | 65:40 | 60 | |
| 4 | 34 | 16 | 10 | 8 | +17 | 56:39 | 58 | |
| 5 | 34 | 15 | 10 | 9 | +10 | 58:48 | 55 | |
| 6 | 34 | 13 | 8 | 13 | -8 | 37:45 | 47 | |
| 7 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -3 | 52:55 | 44 | |
| 8 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -7 | 41:48 | 44 | |
| 9 | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | -11 | 38:49 | 41 | |
| 10 | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -3 | 60:63 | 41 | |
| 11 | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -12 | 44:56 | 41 | |
| 12 | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | -13 | 43:56 | 37 | |
| 13 | 34 | 8 | 8 | 18 | -14 | 44:58 | 32 | |
| 14 | 34 | 7 | 9 | 18 | -20 | 46:66 | 30 | |
| 15 | 34 | 7 | 7 | 20 | -24 | 46:70 | 28 |
Atlanta United FC and Real Salt Lake locked horns in a competitive MLS clash. Both sides showcased their intent early, aiming to control possession and dictate the tempo of the game in front of an expectant crowd.
Atlanta United FC enjoyed a significant share of possession throughout the opening phase, dictating play with 62% of the ball. Their build-up play saw them successfully move the ball into the opposition half 148 times, demonstrating a clear intent to create scoring opportunities. The team's passing accuracy was evident, with 624 successful passes contributing to their control. Despite this territorial advantage and a higher number of attacks, Real Salt Lake's defense remained organized, limiting Atlanta's clear-cut chances and keeping the pressure manageable.
The home side's attacking forays were supported by an expected assists figure of 1.54, indicating a good volume of dangerous passes into the final third. They managed to create 2 big chances, suggesting moments where the breakthrough could have occurred. However, Real Salt Lake's ability to make 13 tackles and 11 interceptions, coupled with 11 clearances, showcased their commitment to disrupting Atlanta's rhythm and preventing them from converting their possession dominance into tangible threats on goal.
As the match progressed, the tactical battle intensified, with both teams seeking to exploit any defensive lapses. Atlanta United continued to probe, their 93 attacks suggesting a persistent effort to break the deadlock. Their shots on target totaled five, with an expected goals tally of 1.16 reflecting a decent, though not overwhelming, offensive output. The aerial duels were closely contested, with both sides fighting for supremacy in the air, adding another layer to the physical nature of the encounter.
Real Salt Lake, while seeing less of the ball, aimed to capitalize on transitions and set-piece opportunities. The limited number of free kicks awarded (4 for Atlanta) suggests a relatively clean game in terms of fouls, but the intensity was palpable. Both teams' defensive structures held firm for much of the contest, with successful tackles and interceptions being crucial for RSL to deny Atlanta's advances. The match remained a tight affair, with neither side able to decisively seize control and secure a crucial advantage.
The statistics paint a picture of a game where Atlanta United exerted more control through possession and build-up play, while Real Salt Lake demonstrated resilience and defensive organization. The low number of corners for Atlanta (4) indicates they struggled to consistently pin RSL back and create sustained pressure from wide areas. Ultimately, the match was characterized by a determined effort from both sides to impose their game plan, leading to a balanced contest with few clear-cut scoring opportunities.