Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2025
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 20 | 6 | 8 | +22 | 57:35 | 66 | |
| 2 | 34 | 20 | 5 | 9 | +12 | 52:40 | 65 | |
| 3 | 34 | 19 | 8 | 7 | +26 | 81:55 | 65 | |
| 4 | 34 | 19 | 2 | 13 | +9 | 55:46 | 59 | |
| 5 | 34 | 17 | 5 | 12 | +6 | 50:44 | 56 | |
| 6 | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | +13 | 58:45 | 54 | |
| 7 | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 55:51 | 54 | |
| 8 | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | +8 | 68:60 | 53 | |
| 9 | 34 | 14 | 11 | 9 | +12 | 63:51 | 53 | |
| 10 | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | +1 | 48:47 | 43 | |
| 11 | 34 | 9 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 44:51 | 36 | |
| 12 | 34 | 6 | 14 | 14 | -7 | 37:44 | 32 | |
| 13 | 34 | 6 | 10 | 18 | -26 | 34:60 | 28 | |
| 14 | 34 | 5 | 13 | 16 | -25 | 38:63 | 28 | |
| 15 | 34 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -36 | 30:66 | 26 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 19 | 6 | 9 | +23 | 64:41 | 63 | |
| 2 | 34 | 18 | 9 | 7 | +28 | 66:38 | 63 | |
| 3 | 34 | 17 | 9 | 8 | +25 | 65:40 | 60 | |
| 4 | 34 | 16 | 10 | 8 | +17 | 56:39 | 58 | |
| 5 | 34 | 15 | 10 | 9 | +10 | 58:48 | 55 | |
| 6 | 34 | 13 | 8 | 13 | -8 | 37:45 | 47 | |
| 7 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -3 | 52:55 | 44 | |
| 8 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -7 | 41:48 | 44 | |
| 9 | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | -11 | 38:49 | 41 | |
| 10 | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -3 | 60:63 | 41 | |
| 11 | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -12 | 44:56 | 41 | |
| 12 | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | -13 | 43:56 | 37 | |
| 13 | 34 | 8 | 8 | 18 | -14 | 44:58 | 32 | |
| 14 | 34 | 7 | 9 | 18 | -20 | 46:66 | 30 | |
| 15 | 34 | 7 | 7 | 20 | -24 | 46:70 | 28 |
Seattle Sounders FC and FC Dallas met in a competitive MLS clash on April 26, 2026. Both sides aimed to assert dominance early, setting the stage for an intriguing tactical battle under the lights.
Seattle Sounders FC asserted a notable presence in the attacking third, evidenced by their 63 total attacks and an expected goals (xG) tally of 1.8. The team demonstrated a willingness to push forward, creating five big chances throughout the match. Their build-up play involved a significant portion of passes in the opposition half, totaling 222, and they were active in trying to unlock the Dallas defense with 70 passes into the final third. The Sounders' possession advantage, holding 58% of the ball, allowed them to dictate the tempo for extended periods.
Despite their offensive endeavors and creating five key passes, the Sounders found it challenging to convert their pressure into definitive scoring opportunities. Their attacking strategy involved a mix of approaches, including 13 crosses with 3 successfully finding a teammate. While they managed 6 shots on target from an xG of 1.8, the final clinical touch seemed to elude them. The team also engaged in numerous duels, winning 11 aerial battles out of 31 contested, showcasing a physical commitment to winning the ball back.
FC Dallas, while perhaps not generating the same volume of attacking statistics as their opponents, focused on a disciplined defensive structure. Their ability to limit Seattle's clear-cut chances, despite the Sounders' 1.8 expected goals, speaks to their organizational strength. The team worked to disrupt Seattle's rhythm, contributing to the Sounders' 67 failed passes and forcing them into challenging situations. Dallas's approach was likely geared towards absorbing pressure and looking for opportunities on the counter.
The defensive resilience of FC Dallas was a key feature of their performance. They were engaged in numerous duels, including 12 tackles with 10 successful, and registered 11 interceptions to break up Seattle's build-up play. The team's backline and midfield worked cohesively to deny Seattle space in dangerous areas, making it difficult for the Sounders to capitalize on their possession advantage and attacking impetus. This defensive solidity was crucial in keeping the match competitive.
As the game progressed, the tactical battle intensified. Seattle continued to probe for an opening, utilizing their 58% possession to their advantage and attempting to create overloads in wide areas through their 13 crosses. However, FC Dallas remained resolute, their defensive shape frustrating Seattle's efforts. The match statistics suggest a contest where Seattle controlled large parts of the game but FC Dallas's defensive organization prevented them from translating that control into a decisive advantage.