Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2025
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 20 | 6 | 8 | +22 | 57:35 | 66 | |
| 2 | 34 | 20 | 5 | 9 | +12 | 52:40 | 65 | |
| 3 | 34 | 19 | 8 | 7 | +26 | 81:55 | 65 | |
| 4 | 34 | 19 | 2 | 13 | +9 | 55:46 | 59 | |
| 5 | 34 | 17 | 5 | 12 | +6 | 50:44 | 56 | |
| 6 | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | +13 | 58:45 | 54 | |
| 7 | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 55:51 | 54 | |
| 8 | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | +8 | 68:60 | 53 | |
| 9 | 34 | 14 | 11 | 9 | +12 | 63:51 | 53 | |
| 10 | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | +1 | 48:47 | 43 | |
| 11 | 34 | 9 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 44:51 | 36 | |
| 12 | 34 | 6 | 14 | 14 | -7 | 37:44 | 32 | |
| 13 | 34 | 6 | 10 | 18 | -26 | 34:60 | 28 | |
| 14 | 34 | 5 | 13 | 16 | -25 | 38:63 | 28 | |
| 15 | 34 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -36 | 30:66 | 26 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 19 | 6 | 9 | +23 | 64:41 | 63 | |
| 2 | 34 | 18 | 9 | 7 | +28 | 66:38 | 63 | |
| 3 | 34 | 17 | 9 | 8 | +25 | 65:40 | 60 | |
| 4 | 34 | 16 | 10 | 8 | +17 | 56:39 | 58 | |
| 5 | 34 | 15 | 10 | 9 | +10 | 58:48 | 55 | |
| 6 | 34 | 13 | 8 | 13 | -8 | 37:45 | 47 | |
| 7 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -3 | 52:55 | 44 | |
| 8 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -7 | 41:48 | 44 | |
| 9 | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | -11 | 38:49 | 41 | |
| 10 | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -3 | 60:63 | 41 | |
| 11 | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -12 | 44:56 | 41 | |
| 12 | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | -13 | 43:56 | 37 | |
| 13 | 34 | 8 | 8 | 18 | -14 | 44:58 | 32 | |
| 14 | 34 | 7 | 9 | 18 | -20 | 46:66 | 30 | |
| 15 | 34 | 7 | 7 | 20 | -24 | 46:70 | 28 |
The Vancouver Whitecaps hosted San Jose Earthquakes in a competitive MLS clash on March 22, 2026. Both sides sought an early advantage, with the Whitecaps looking to assert dominance on home turf against a determined Earthquakes outfit.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC controlled the tempo for significant portions of the match, enjoying a commanding 62% possession. Their build-up play saw them accumulate 308 passes in the opposition half, indicating a clear intent to probe and create scoring opportunities. The team registered 92 attacks throughout the game, demonstrating a persistent effort to break down the San Jose defense. Their attacking strategy involved a notable number of crosses, with 23 attempts, although only 5 found their mark, highlighting a need for greater accuracy in the final delivery.
The Whitecaps created three big chances, suggesting they were close to finding the back of the net on multiple occasions. Their expected goals (xG) stood at 0.98, reflecting the quality of opportunities they generated. With 8 key passes and 132 passes into the final third, Vancouver's offensive structure was evident. Despite their territorial advantage and attacking pressure, converting these promising situations into goals proved to be a challenge, keeping the scoreline tight.
San Jose Earthquakes, while seeing less of the ball, remained organized and looked to capitalize on transitions. Their defensive unit worked hard to deny Vancouver clear sight of goal, contributing to the Whitecaps' 6 shots on target from 0.98 expected goals. The Earthquakes' ability to limit the effectiveness of Vancouver's crosses and passes into dangerous areas was a testament to their tactical discipline. They aimed to frustrate the home side and make them work for every inch of the pitch.
Despite the Whitecaps' sustained pressure and statistical dominance in possession and attacks, the match remained finely balanced. Vancouver's 62% possession and 92 attacks did not translate into a decisive lead, with their expected goals suggesting a tight affair. The 3 corners and 8 key passes from the Whitecaps indicated periods of dominance, but the Earthquakes' resilience meant the game was always in the balance, with neither side able to fully assert control.
The game saw Vancouver's attacking endeavors, marked by 132 passes into the final third and 3 big chances created, ultimately fall short of breaking the deadlock. Their 0.98 expected goals figure underscored a performance that was full of intent but lacked the clinical edge needed to secure victory. The Earthquakes' defensive solidity played a crucial role in keeping the Whitecaps at bay, ensuring a tense contest throughout.