Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 27 | 6 | 5 | +54 | 89:35 | 87 | |
| 2 | 38 | 23 | 7 | 8 | +22 | 58:36 | 76 | |
| 3 | 38 | 23 | 4 | 11 | +28 | 59:31 | 73 | |
| 4 | 38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | +36 | 65:29 | 71 | |
| 5 | 38 | 20 | 10 | 8 | +18 | 53:35 | 70 | |
| 6 | 38 | 19 | 12 | 7 | +27 | 61:34 | 69 | |
| 7 | 38 | 15 | 14 | 9 | +15 | 51:36 | 59 | |
| 8 | 38 | 16 | 8 | 14 | +3 | 49:46 | 56 | |
| 9 | 38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | +1 | 41:40 | 54 | |
| 10 | 38 | 14 | 8 | 16 | -3 | 45:48 | 50 | |
| 11 | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | -4 | 46:50 | 49 | |
| 12 | 38 | 12 | 9 | 17 | -19 | 44:63 | 45 | |
| 13 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | -18 | 28:46 | 45 | |
| 14 | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | -13 | 40:53 | 43 | |
| 15 | 38 | 9 | 15 | 14 | -9 | 41:50 | 42 | |
| 16 | 38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | -10 | 41:51 | 41 | |
| 17 | 38 | 10 | 8 | 20 | -22 | 28:50 | 38 | |
| 18 | 38 | 8 | 10 | 20 | -25 | 32:57 | 34 | |
| 19 | 38 | 3 | 12 | 23 | -36 | 25:61 | 21 | |
| 20 | 38 | 2 | 12 | 24 | -45 | 26:71 | 18 |
Serie A action returned with a mid-January clash as Como hosted AC Milan. Both sides entered the encounter seeking crucial league points, setting the stage for a potentially tense and tactical battle on the pitch. The atmosphere crackled with anticipation.
Como demonstrated a clear intent to control possession and build attacks, evidenced by their significant presence in the opposition half and a high number of passes into the final third. Their ability to create 2 big chances and register an expected goals figure of 1.87 suggests they were actively probing the AC Milan defence and generating scoring opportunities. The team's 30 crosses, with 7 finding their target, indicate a strategy focused on wide play and delivery into the box, aiming to exploit aerial duels.
Despite Como's attacking endeavors, AC Milan's defensive shape and tactical discipline appeared to hold firm. The Rossoneri's backline, marshalled by experienced defenders, likely worked to stifle Como's build-up play and limit clear-cut chances. While specific defensive actions aren't detailed, the pressure exerted by Como suggests Milan had to be alert and organized, potentially relying on strong individual performances and collective efforts to deny their hosts.
The second half likely saw a continuation of the tactical battle, with both teams striving to find the decisive breakthrough. Como's persistent attacking pressure, reflected in their 1.53 expected assists and 16 key passes, meant they were constantly looking to unlock the Milan defence. The 8 shots on target indicate that Butez's goal was tested, though the overall shot accuracy suggests conversion was a challenge throughout the match for the home side.
AC Milan, while perhaps less dominant in possession and attacking metrics, would have focused on maintaining their defensive structure and looking for opportunities on the counter or from set pieces. The statistics hint at a game where fine margins were at play. With 8 corners for Como and a closely contested possession battle, the match was likely a tight affair, with both teams having moments where they threatened to seize control but ultimately unable to fully capitalize.
The final statistics paint a picture of a competitive fixture where Como generated a notable volume of attacking play and chances, but AC Milan's defensive solidity or their own attacking efficiency proved to be the deciding factor. The expected goals and big chances created by Como underscore their efforts, suggesting a match where they perhaps felt they had done enough to score but were ultimately thwarted by the opposition or a lack of clinical finishing.