Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 27 | 6 | 5 | +54 | 89:35 | 87 | |
| 2 | 38 | 23 | 7 | 8 | +22 | 58:36 | 76 | |
| 3 | 38 | 23 | 4 | 11 | +28 | 59:31 | 73 | |
| 4 | 38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | +36 | 65:29 | 71 | |
| 5 | 38 | 20 | 10 | 8 | +18 | 53:35 | 70 | |
| 6 | 38 | 19 | 12 | 7 | +27 | 61:34 | 69 | |
| 7 | 38 | 15 | 14 | 9 | +15 | 51:36 | 59 | |
| 8 | 38 | 16 | 8 | 14 | +3 | 49:46 | 56 | |
| 9 | 38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | +1 | 41:40 | 54 | |
| 10 | 38 | 14 | 8 | 16 | -3 | 45:48 | 50 | |
| 11 | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | -4 | 46:50 | 49 | |
| 12 | 38 | 12 | 9 | 17 | -19 | 44:63 | 45 | |
| 13 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | -18 | 28:46 | 45 | |
| 14 | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | -13 | 40:53 | 43 | |
| 15 | 38 | 9 | 15 | 14 | -9 | 41:50 | 42 | |
| 16 | 38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | -10 | 41:51 | 41 | |
| 17 | 38 | 10 | 8 | 20 | -22 | 28:50 | 38 | |
| 18 | 38 | 8 | 10 | 20 | -25 | 32:57 | 34 | |
| 19 | 38 | 3 | 12 | 23 | -36 | 25:61 | 21 | |
| 20 | 38 | 2 | 12 | 24 | -45 | 26:71 | 18 |
Como welcomed AS Roma to their home ground on March 15, 2026, for a compelling Serie A clash. The hosts dominated the proceedings with intense tactical pressure, forcing the visitors to remain resilient throughout a challenging ninety minutes of football.
Como established a clear tactical superiority from the opening whistle, asserting control over the midfield with an impressive sixty-six percent possession rate. By consistently funneling play into the opposition final third, the hosts registered ninety-one passes into dangerous areas. The creative engine of the team was firing on all cylinders, as they generated thirteen key passes and four big chances throughout the opening phase. Roma found themselves pinned back, struggling to disrupt the rhythm as the home side moved the ball with precision and intent.
The tactical setup employed by Como proved difficult for the Roma defensive structure to navigate during the initial exchanges. With Jean Butez anchoring the backline and Sergi Roberto orchestrating the flow of play, the hosts utilized long passes effectively to bypass the press. While the accuracy of their shots remained at thirty-two percent, the sheer volume of attacking arrivals kept the pressure high. Roma were forced to rely on defensive clearances and disciplined positioning to prevent the home side from breaking the deadlock early on.
As the match progressed, Como continued to probe the Roma defense with relentless energy. The hosts utilized wide areas frequently, sending nineteen crosses into the box and successfully connecting on four of them. Their aerial dominance was particularly evident, winning twenty-one out of thirty-three contested aerial duels. This physical presence allowed them to maintain a high expected goals value of 2.22, illustrating the quality of the opportunities they manufactured. Roma remained disciplined, however, absorbing the pressure and looking for rare moments to launch counter-attacking transitions.
Roma defensive efforts were tested by the technical proficiency of the Como attackers, who completed eleven successful dribbles to bypass defenders. Despite the constant offensive onslaught, the visitors managed to keep their defensive shape intact, limiting the damage despite facing seven shots on target. The tactical battle remained fierce, with both sides navigating a high-intensity environment that demanded absolute focus. Como relentless pursuit of a breakthrough ensured that the match remained a high-stakes affair, forcing Roma to remain compact and organized until the very final whistle blew.
Ultimately, the statistical dominance of Como highlighted a match defined by sustained offensive intent and defensive resilience. With 477 successful passes, the hosts dictated the flow, yet Roma stood firm to navigate a testing afternoon in Serie A. The lack of offsides for Como suggested a highly disciplined approach to their attacking movements, while the consistent foul count led to eighteen free kicks, further disrupting the flow of the game. It was a tactical stalemate that showcased the contrasting styles of both Italian clubs.