Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Conference League 2025/26
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | +6 | 11:5 | 16 | |
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | +7 | 9:2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +7 | 14:7 | 13 | |
| 4 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +7 | 10:3 | 13 | |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +6 | 13:7 | 13 | |
| 6 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +5 | 10:5 | 13 | |
| 7 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +4 | 7:3 | 13 | |
| 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | +6 | 7:1 | 12 | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +3 | 6:3 | 11 | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +5 | 11:6 | 10 | |
| 11 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +4 | 12:8 | 10 | |
| 12 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +4 | 10:6 | 10 | |
| 13 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 8:7 | 10 | |
| 14 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +0 | 7:7 | 10 | |
| 15 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | +3 | 8:5 | 9 | |
| 16 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | +3 | 5:2 | 9 | |
| 17 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 5:4 | 9 | |
| 18 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 5:4 | 8 | |
| 19 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 6:7 | 8 | |
| 20 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -4 | 4:8 | 8 | |
| 21 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | +1 | 6:5 | 7 | |
| 22 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -1 | 4:5 | 7 | |
| 23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 8:10 | 7 | |
| 24 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 7:9 | 7 | |
| 25 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 6:8 | 7 | |
| 26 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -8 | 7:15 | 7 | |
| 27 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | +0 | 9:9 | 6 | |
| 28 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | +0 | 8:8 | 6 | |
| 29 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 5:9 | 6 | |
| 30 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -5 | 6:11 | 5 | |
| 31 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -6 | 7:13 | 4 | |
| 32 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -3 | 5:8 | 3 | |
| 33 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -7 | 4:11 | 3 | |
| 34 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -7 | 0:7 | 2 | |
| 35 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -11 | 3:14 | 2 | |
| 36 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | -11 | 3:14 | 1 |
AZ Alkmaar and Shakhtar Donetsk locked horns in a tense Conference League encounter. Both sides sought a crucial advantage, with possession and attacking intent dominating the early exchanges as the match unfolded under the lights.
AZ Alkmaar asserted a degree of control, evidenced by their higher possession statistics and a greater number of passes into the opposition half. The Dutch side's build-up play saw them probe for openings, creating a notable three big chances throughout the period. Their attacking forays, though not always resulting in clear-cut opportunities, kept the Shakhtar defense occupied and demonstrated a clear intent to break the deadlock. The tactical battle focused on exploiting space and maintaining momentum.
The home team's attacking statistics, including 77 attacks and 66 passes into the final third, highlight their commitment to offensive pressure. While their shot accuracy was moderate, the volume of their attempts and the creation of key passes suggested a team actively seeking to impose themselves. Shakhtar, meanwhile, focused on defensive solidity, aiming to frustrate AZ's advances and look for opportunities on the counter through their own attacking movements and transitions.
As the match progressed, the intensity remained high, with both teams demonstrating resilience. AZ Alkmaar continued to push forward, their attacking numbers reflecting a persistent effort to find the back of the net. The tactical approach involved intricate passing movements and a willingness to commit players forward, aiming to unlock the Shakhtar defense. Despite the pressure and the creation of key chances, the final execution in front of goal proved challenging for the Alkmaar attackers.
Shakhtar Donetsk, operating with a clear defensive structure, worked to stifle AZ's offensive rhythm. Their ability to win tackles and make clearances was crucial in repelling waves of attacks. The match statistics suggest a contest where AZ held a slight edge in offensive metrics, but Shakhtar's organized approach ensured that clear-cut scoring opportunities were hard-earned. The game remained finely balanced, a testament to the tactical discipline displayed by both sides throughout the ninety minutes.
The overall attacking statistics for AZ Alkmaar, including expected goals and big chances created, indicate a team that generated opportunities but perhaps lacked the clinical edge to convert them. Shakhtar's defensive efforts were effective in limiting the impact of AZ's offensive pressure, leading to a tight contest where neither side could definitively seize control. The final whistle likely signaled a hard-fought draw or a narrow victory decided by fine margins.