Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Conference League 2025/26
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | +6 | 11:5 | 16 | |
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | +7 | 9:2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +7 | 14:7 | 13 | |
| 4 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +7 | 10:3 | 13 | |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +6 | 13:7 | 13 | |
| 6 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +5 | 10:5 | 13 | |
| 7 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +4 | 7:3 | 13 | |
| 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | +6 | 7:1 | 12 | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +3 | 6:3 | 11 | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +5 | 11:6 | 10 | |
| 11 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +4 | 12:8 | 10 | |
| 12 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +4 | 10:6 | 10 | |
| 13 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 8:7 | 10 | |
| 14 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +0 | 7:7 | 10 | |
| 15 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | +3 | 8:5 | 9 | |
| 16 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | +3 | 5:2 | 9 | |
| 17 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 5:4 | 9 | |
| 18 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 5:4 | 8 | |
| 19 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 6:7 | 8 | |
| 20 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -4 | 4:8 | 8 | |
| 21 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | +1 | 6:5 | 7 | |
| 22 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -1 | 4:5 | 7 | |
| 23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 8:10 | 7 | |
| 24 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 7:9 | 7 | |
| 25 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 6:8 | 7 | |
| 26 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -8 | 7:15 | 7 | |
| 27 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | +0 | 9:9 | 6 | |
| 28 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | +0 | 8:8 | 6 | |
| 29 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 5:9 | 6 | |
| 30 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -5 | 6:11 | 5 | |
| 31 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -6 | 7:13 | 4 | |
| 32 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -3 | 5:8 | 3 | |
| 33 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -7 | 4:11 | 3 | |
| 34 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -7 | 0:7 | 2 | |
| 35 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -11 | 3:14 | 2 | |
| 36 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | -11 | 3:14 | 1 |
A keenly contested Conference League encounter saw Shakhtar Donetsk host Crystal Palace. Both sides sought to establish dominance early, with the home team aiming to leverage their attacking intent against a resolute Eagles defence. The atmosphere crackled with anticipation as the match unfolded.
Shakhtar Donetsk asserted significant control over possession throughout the initial phase, dictating the tempo with 71% of the ball. Their build-up play saw them advance into the opposition half frequently, registering 371 passes compared to Palace's significantly lower total. The Pitmen's attacking strategy involved numerous crosses, with 30 attempted, aiming to unlock the Eagles' backline. This sustained pressure resulted in a notable number of key passes and passes into the final third, indicating a consistent effort to create scoring opportunities.
The home side's attacking statistics reflect their territorial advantage and possession-based approach. With 189 attacks and a high volume of passes into dangerous areas, Shakhtar consistently probed Crystal Palace's defence. Their ability to win aerial duels and execute successful dribbles further underscored their intent to break down the opposition. While not all their efforts culminated in shots on target, the sheer volume of attacking actions suggested a team firmly in the ascendancy and looking to convert their dominance into tangible results.
Despite Shakhtar's overwhelming possession and attacking forays, Crystal Palace demonstrated commendable defensive resilience. The Eagles managed to limit the direct threat on their goal, although the statistics suggest they were often on the back foot. Shakhtar's expected goals figure of 1.06 indicates they created chances of reasonable quality, with two big chances being highlighted. However, their shot accuracy was low, suggesting a struggle to convert their dominance into clear-cut, on-target efforts that would truly test Dean Henderson.
The match statistics paint a picture of Shakhtar Donetsk dominating the ball and territory, but struggling to convert this into decisive attacking output. Their high number of corners, 13, and successful crosses, 8, demonstrate their intent to attack wide, but the overall shots on target were limited. Crystal Palace, while less statistically prominent in attacking metrics, likely focused on maintaining defensive shape and exploiting any opportunities that arose. The game was characterized by Shakhtar's persistent, yet ultimately unrewarded, attacking pressure against a disciplined Palace side.
Ultimately, the encounter highlighted a tactical battle where Shakhtar Donetsk controlled the flow of the game through possession and attacking intent. Their statistical superiority in areas like attacks, passes, and crosses showcased their ambition to win. However, Crystal Palace's ability to absorb pressure and limit the effectiveness of Shakhtar's final ball meant that the game remained finely balanced, with both sides having faced distinct challenges in imposing their will definitively on the scoreline.