Latest Highlights
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MLS 2025
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 20 | 6 | 8 | +22 | 57:35 | 66 | |
| 2 | 34 | 20 | 5 | 9 | +12 | 52:40 | 65 | |
| 3 | 34 | 19 | 8 | 7 | +26 | 81:55 | 65 | |
| 4 | 34 | 19 | 2 | 13 | +9 | 55:46 | 59 | |
| 5 | 34 | 17 | 5 | 12 | +6 | 50:44 | 56 | |
| 6 | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | +13 | 58:45 | 54 | |
| 7 | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 55:51 | 54 | |
| 8 | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | +8 | 68:60 | 53 | |
| 9 | 34 | 14 | 11 | 9 | +12 | 63:51 | 53 | |
| 10 | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | +1 | 48:47 | 43 | |
| 11 | 34 | 9 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 44:51 | 36 | |
| 12 | 34 | 6 | 14 | 14 | -7 | 37:44 | 32 | |
| 13 | 34 | 6 | 10 | 18 | -26 | 34:60 | 28 | |
| 14 | 34 | 5 | 13 | 16 | -25 | 38:63 | 28 | |
| 15 | 34 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -36 | 30:66 | 26 |
| # | GP | W | D | L | DIFF | Goals | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 19 | 6 | 9 | +23 | 64:41 | 63 | |
| 2 | 34 | 18 | 9 | 7 | +28 | 66:38 | 63 | |
| 3 | 34 | 17 | 9 | 8 | +25 | 65:40 | 60 | |
| 4 | 34 | 16 | 10 | 8 | +17 | 56:39 | 58 | |
| 5 | 34 | 15 | 10 | 9 | +10 | 58:48 | 55 | |
| 6 | 34 | 13 | 8 | 13 | -8 | 37:45 | 47 | |
| 7 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -3 | 52:55 | 44 | |
| 8 | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | -7 | 41:48 | 44 | |
| 9 | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | -11 | 38:49 | 41 | |
| 10 | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -3 | 60:63 | 41 | |
| 11 | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -12 | 44:56 | 41 | |
| 12 | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | -13 | 43:56 | 37 | |
| 13 | 34 | 8 | 8 | 18 | -14 | 44:58 | 32 | |
| 14 | 34 | 7 | 9 | 18 | -20 | 46:66 | 30 | |
| 15 | 34 | 7 | 7 | 20 | -24 | 46:70 | 28 |
Inter Miami CF and New York Red Bulls locked horns in a competitive MLS clash. Both sides showcased attacking intent, with Miami holding a slight possession advantage throughout the encounter. The match promised tactical battles and moments of individual brilliance under the lights.
Inter Miami exerted significant pressure, evidenced by their 92 attacks and 2.14 expected goals. They created seven big chances, demonstrating their ability to penetrate the Red Bulls' defense. With 93 passes into the final third and 14 key passes, Miami's build-up play was intricate, aiming to unlock the opposition. Their 55% possession share allowed them to dictate much of the tempo, forcing the Red Bulls into defensive actions and limiting their opportunities to build sustained attacks.
Despite Miami's offensive surges, the Red Bulls' defensive organization held firm. The visitors worked diligently to disrupt Miami's rhythm, making 17 tackles and 15 clearances. While Miami's attacking statistics were impressive, the Red Bulls managed to keep the scoreline level, showcasing their tactical discipline and commitment to preventing clear-cut opportunities. The game remained in a delicate balance, with neither side able to establish a decisive lead through sustained periods of dominance.
The second half continued in a similar vein, with both teams vying for control. Inter Miami's attacking ambition remained high, as reflected in their 12 corners and consistent efforts to find the back of the net. Their 2.34 expected assists statistic suggests they were consistently creating dangerous situations, though converting these into goals proved challenging against a resolute Red Bulls backline. The intensity of the match was palpable, with players battling for every inch of the pitch.
New York Red Bulls, while perhaps seeing less of the ball, remained a threat on the counter. The match statistics reveal a close contest, with both teams contributing to an engaging spectacle. The attacking metrics suggest a game with numerous chances, but the final execution was not always clinical. Ultimately, the game was a testament to the fine margins in MLS, where defensive solidity and attacking efficiency are key determinants of success, leaving both sides to reflect on what might have been.
The attacking statistics paint a picture of a game where Inter Miami pushed hard for a breakthrough, generating a high volume of chances and enjoying the lion's share of possession. However, the Red Bulls' defensive efforts prevented Miami from capitalizing fully. The final statistics, including shots on target and expected goals, suggest a tightly contested affair where neither team could definitively assert their dominance, leading to a result that likely left both managers evaluating their team's performance.